Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Kurrajong

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Kurrajong, NSW 2758

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 3, Kurrajong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareKurrajong
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$2.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.36%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%-
1-year house growth+14.7%-0.5%estimate
3-year house growth+32.0%-
Vacancy rate1.8%0.6%
Population2,5423,113

Aberdare vs Kurrajong: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $2.0M in Kurrajong, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Kurrajong the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.36% in Kurrajong, a gap of 1.74 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and -0.5% in Kurrajong (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberdare, while Kurrajong went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Kurrajong and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Kurrajong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kurrajong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,113 against 2,542, larger than Aberdare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Kurrajong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison