Aberdare vs Lower Belford
Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Lower Belford, NSW 2335
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 2, Lower Belford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdare | Lower Belford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | - |
| Median unit price | $550K | $550K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 2.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.43% | 5.12% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Population | 2,542 | 407 |
Aberdare vs Lower Belford: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.55% in Lower Belford, a gap of 1.55 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 407, roughly 6 times the size of Lower Belford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdare for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison