Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Marks Point

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Marks Point, NSW 2280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 4, Marks Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareMarks Point
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%3.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%4.40%
1-year house growth+14.7%+7.3%estimate
3-year house growth+32.0%-
Vacancy rate1.8%0.9%
Population2,5421,861

Aberdare vs Marks Point: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $690K in Marks Point, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Marks Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 3.52% in Marks Point, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +7.3% in Marks Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Marks Point and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Marks Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,861, larger than Marks Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Marks Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison