Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Newcastle

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Newcastle, NSW 2300

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 4, Newcastle wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareNewcastle
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$1M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.41%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%-
1-year house growth+14.7%+7.6%
3-year house growth+32.0%+17.5%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.5%
Population2,5423,852

Aberdare vs Newcastle: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $1M in Newcastle, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Newcastle the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.41% in Newcastle, a gap of 1.69 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +7.6% in Newcastle, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Newcastle houses +17.5%, so Aberdare has compounded faster than Newcastle over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Newcastle and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Newcastle face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newcastle is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,852 against 2,542, larger than Aberdare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Newcastle for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison