Aberdare vs Oakhampton
Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Oakhampton, NSW 2320
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 0, Oakhampton wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdare | Oakhampton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $740K |
| Median unit price | $550K | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 4.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.43% | 5.84% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Population | 2,542 | 165 |
Aberdare vs Oakhampton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Aberdare and $740K in Oakhampton.
For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $525K in Oakhampton, which makes Oakhampton the more affordable unit market and Aberdare the pricier one.
On cash flow, Oakhampton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.55%, compared with 4.10% in Aberdare, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 165, roughly 15 times the size of Oakhampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Oakhampton for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison