Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Otford

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Otford, NSW 2508

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 4, Otford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareOtford
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.11%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%4.37%
1-year house growth+14.7%-0.1%
3-year house growth+32.0%-
Vacancy rate1.8%1.2%
Population2,542396

Aberdare vs Otford: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $910K in Otford, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Otford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.11% in Otford, a gap of 1.99 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and -0.1% in Otford, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, while Otford went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Otford and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Otford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 396, roughly 6 times the size of Otford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Otford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison