Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Paxton

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Paxton, NSW 2325

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 2, Paxton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdarePaxton
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%5.60%
1-year house growth+14.7%+11.2%
3-year house growth+32.0%+46.0%
Vacancy rate1.8%2.2%
Population2,5421,215

Aberdare vs Paxton: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $465K in Paxton, which makes Paxton the more affordable unit market and Aberdare the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +11.2% in Paxton, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Paxton houses +46.0%, so Paxton has compounded faster than Aberdare over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Aberdare and 2.2% in Paxton, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,215, roughly 2.1 times the size of Paxton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for recent price momentum, Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison