Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Vineyard

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Vineyard, NSW 2765

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 3, Vineyard wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareVineyard
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$550K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%5.17%
1-year house growth+14.7%+7.7%
3-year house growth+32.0%+16.8%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.5%
Population2,5421,143

Aberdare vs Vineyard: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 3.34% in Vineyard, a gap of 0.76 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +7.7% in Vineyard, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Vineyard houses +16.8%, so Aberdare has compounded faster than Vineyard over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Vineyard and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Vineyard face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,143, roughly 2.2 times the size of Vineyard; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Vineyard for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison