Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Euston

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2333 vs Euston, NSW 2737

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 3, Euston wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenEuston
Median house price$515K$520K
Median unit price$305K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.68%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)6.68%4.69%
1-year house growth-6.3%estimate-3.8%estimate
3-year house growth+80.0%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.0%
Population2,051822

Aberdeen vs Euston: what the numbers say

The median house price is $515K in Aberdeen and $520K in Euston, so Aberdeen is the cheaper entry point, with Euston houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.68%, compared with 3.00% in Euston, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -6.3% in Aberdeen (an estimate) and -3.8% in Euston (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Euston, while Aberdeen went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Euston and 1.4% in Aberdeen, so landlords in Euston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 822, roughly 2.5 times the size of Euston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for a lower purchase price, Euston for recent price momentum, Euston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Aberdeen vs Euston: Property Investment Comparison (2026)