Aberdeen vs Rocky Creek
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2333 vs Rocky Creek, NSW 2371
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 1, Rocky Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Rocky Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $515K | $515K |
| Median unit price | $305K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.68% | 4.32% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.68% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -6.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | +80.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Population | 2,051 | 25 |
Aberdeen vs Rocky Creek: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $515K in Aberdeen and $515K in Rocky Creek.
On cash flow, Rocky Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.32%, compared with 3.68% in Aberdeen, a gap of 0.64 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Aberdeen and 1.8% in Rocky Creek, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 25, roughly 82 times the size of Rocky Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rocky Creek for rental income, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison