Aberdeen vs Bondi
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Bondi, NSW 2026
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 3, Bondi wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Bondi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $1.5M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.80% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.5% | -1.2% |
| 3-year house growth | +48.1% | +5.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Population | 2,051 | 10,411 |
Aberdeen vs Bondi: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and -1.2% in Bondi, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, while Bondi went backwards.
Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Bondi houses +5.6%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Bondi over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 2.2% in Bondi, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bondi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,411 against 2,051, roughly 5 times the size of Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison