Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Brookvale

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Brookvale, NSW 2100

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 3, Brookvale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenBrookvale
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price-$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%2.97%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.10%
1-year house growth+9.5%+1.0%
3-year house growth+48.1%+1.4%
Vacancy rate1.9%0.8%
Population2,0513,389

Aberdeen vs Brookvale: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 2.97% in Brookvale, a gap of 1.88 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +1.0% in Brookvale, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Brookvale houses +1.4%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Brookvale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Brookvale and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in Brookvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brookvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,389 against 2,051, larger than Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Brookvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison