Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs New Brighton

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs New Brighton, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 4, New Brighton wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenNew Brighton
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price-$890K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%3.96%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.25%
1-year house growth+9.5%-0.8%
3-year house growth+48.1%+11.3%
Vacancy rate1.9%2.0%
Population2,051368

Aberdeen vs New Brighton: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 3.96% in New Brighton, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and -0.8% in New Brighton, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, while New Brighton went backwards.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and New Brighton houses +11.3%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than New Brighton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 2.0% in New Brighton, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 368, roughly 6 times the size of New Brighton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison