Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Tamworth

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Tamworth, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 2, Tamworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenTamworth
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%3.79%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.32%
1-year house growth+9.5%+15.1%
3-year house growth+48.1%+28.4%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.4%
Population2,051189

Aberdeen vs Tamworth: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 3.79% in Tamworth, a gap of 1.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +15.1% in Tamworth, so recent momentum favours Tamworth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Tamworth houses +28.4%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Tamworth over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Tamworth and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in Tamworth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 189, roughly 11 times the size of Tamworth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Tamworth for recent price momentum, Tamworth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison