Aberfeldie vs Anglesea
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Anglesea, VIC 3230
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Anglesea wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Anglesea |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 2.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | -3.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 0.9% |
| Population | 3,925 | 3,208 |
Aberfeldie vs Anglesea: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Anglesea leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.60%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and -3.0% in Anglesea (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberfeldie, while Anglesea went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Anglesea and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Anglesea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 3,208, larger than Anglesea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anglesea for rental income, Aberfeldie for recent price momentum, Anglesea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison