Aberfeldie vs Ardmona
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Ardmona, VIC 3629
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Ardmona wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Ardmona |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $445K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.93% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | +1.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Population | 3,925 | 497 |
Aberfeldie vs Ardmona: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $445K in Ardmona, which makes Ardmona the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +1.1% in Ardmona, so recent momentum favours Ardmona, while Aberfeldie went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 1.6% in Ardmona, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 497, roughly 8 times the size of Ardmona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ardmona for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison