Aberfeldie vs Big Hill
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Big Hill, VIC 3555
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Big Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Big Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.62% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | +11.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +22.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 5.1% |
| Population | 3,925 | 281 |
Aberfeldie vs Big Hill: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $510K in Big Hill, which makes Big Hill the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +11.2% in Big Hill, so recent momentum favours Big Hill, while Aberfeldie went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 5.1% in Big Hill, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 281, roughly 14 times the size of Big Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Big Hill for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison