Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Black Range

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Black Range, VIC 3381

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Black Range wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieBlack Range
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.75%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+11.3%
3-year house growth-+51.8%
Vacancy rate1.5%6.2%
Population3,925274

Aberfeldie vs Black Range: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $365K in Black Range, which makes Black Range the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Black Range leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.70%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 0.72 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +11.3% in Black Range, so recent momentum favours Black Range, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 6.2% in Black Range, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 274, roughly 14 times the size of Black Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Black Range for rental income, Black Range for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison