Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Drysdale

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Drysdale, VIC 3222

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Drysdale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieDrysdale
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.28%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+5.9%
3-year house growth-+1.1%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.1%
Population3,9254,976

Aberfeldie vs Drysdale: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $530K in Drysdale, which makes Drysdale the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Drysdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.92 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +5.9% in Drysdale, so recent momentum favours Drysdale, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Drysdale and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Drysdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Drysdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,976 against 3,925, larger than Aberfeldie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Drysdale for rental income, Drysdale for recent price momentum, Drysdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison