Aberfeldie vs Freeburgh
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Freeburgh, VIC 3741
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Freeburgh wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Freeburgh |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $425K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 2.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.94% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Population | 3,925 | 136 |
Aberfeldie vs Freeburgh: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $425K in Freeburgh, which makes Freeburgh the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
On cash flow, Freeburgh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.80%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 0.82 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Freeburgh and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Freeburgh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 136, roughly 29 times the size of Freeburgh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Freeburgh for rental income, Freeburgh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison