Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Glenburn

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Glenburn, VIC 3717

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 2, Glenburn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieGlenburn
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$385K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%1.78%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.22%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+1.0%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%3.1%
Population3,925443

Aberfeldie vs Glenburn: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $385K in Glenburn, which makes Glenburn the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberfeldie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.98%, compared with 1.78% in Glenburn, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +1.0% in Glenburn, so recent momentum favours Glenburn, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 3.1% in Glenburn, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 443, roughly 9 times the size of Glenburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberfeldie for rental income, Glenburn for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison