Aberfeldie vs Haven
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Haven, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Haven wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Haven |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $435K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 2.32% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.02% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | - |
| Population | 3,925 | 1,443 |
Aberfeldie vs Haven: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $435K in Haven, which makes Haven the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
On cash flow, Haven leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.32%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 0.34 percentage points.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 1,443, roughly 2.7 times the size of Haven; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Haven for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison