Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Lake Bunga

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Lake Bunga, VIC 3909

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 2, Lake Bunga wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieLake Bunga
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%4.25%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.00%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate-1.0%
3-year house growth--4.0%
Vacancy rate1.5%2.2%
Population3,925408

Aberfeldie vs Lake Bunga: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $395K in Lake Bunga, which makes Lake Bunga the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lake Bunga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.25%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 2.27 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and -1.0% in Lake Bunga, so recent momentum favours Aberfeldie, while Lake Bunga went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 2.2% in Lake Bunga, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 408, roughly 10 times the size of Lake Bunga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lake Bunga for rental income, Aberfeldie for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison