Aberfeldie vs Long Forest
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Long Forest, VIC 3340
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Long Forest wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Long Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.76% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Population | 3,925 | 343 |
Aberfeldie vs Long Forest: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $570K in Long Forest, which makes Long Forest the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.5%.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 343, roughly 11 times the size of Long Forest; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison