Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Macclesfield

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Macclesfield, VIC 3782

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 3, Macclesfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieMacclesfield
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$965K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%1.65%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.31%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+3.0%
3-year house growth--4.7%
Vacancy rate1.5%5.3%
Population3,925878

Aberfeldie vs Macclesfield: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $965K in Macclesfield, which makes Aberfeldie the more affordable unit market and Macclesfield the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberfeldie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.98%, compared with 1.65% in Macclesfield, a gap of 0.33 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +3.0% in Macclesfield, so recent momentum favours Macclesfield, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 5.3% in Macclesfield, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 878, roughly 4.5 times the size of Macclesfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberfeldie for rental income, Macclesfield for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison