Aberfeldie vs Mailors Flat
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Mailors Flat, VIC 3275
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Mailors Flat wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Mailors Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $460K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 1.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.22% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | - |
| Population | 3,925 | 490 |
Aberfeldie vs Mailors Flat: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $460K in Mailors Flat, which makes Mailors Flat the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aberfeldie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.98%, compared with 1.78% in Mailors Flat, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 490, roughly 8 times the size of Mailors Flat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberfeldie for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison