Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Mount Taylor

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Mount Taylor, VIC 3875

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Mount Taylor wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieMount Taylor
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$390K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%3.01%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.22%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+0.0%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%5.7%
Population3,925330

Aberfeldie vs Mount Taylor: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $390K in Mount Taylor, which makes Mount Taylor the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mount Taylor leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.01%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.03 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +0.0% in Mount Taylor, so recent momentum favours Mount Taylor, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 5.7% in Mount Taylor, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 330, roughly 12 times the size of Mount Taylor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Taylor for rental income, Mount Taylor for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Aberfeldie vs Mount Taylor: Suburb Comparison 2026