Aberfeldie vs Muckatah
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Muckatah, VIC 3644
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Muckatah wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Muckatah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $335K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.63% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Population | 3,925 | 170 |
Aberfeldie vs Muckatah: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $335K in Muckatah, which makes Muckatah the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.5%.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 170, roughly 23 times the size of Muckatah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison