Aberfeldie vs Musk Vale
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Musk Vale, VIC 3461
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 2, Musk Vale wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Musk Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $770K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.55% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 3.4% |
| Population | 3,925 | 170 |
Aberfeldie vs Musk Vale: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $770K in Musk Vale, which makes Aberfeldie the more affordable unit market and Musk Vale the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 3.4% in Musk Vale, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 170, roughly 23 times the size of Musk Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison