Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Noorat

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Noorat, VIC 3265

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Noorat wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieNoorat
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$435K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%3.79%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.67%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+16.4%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%3.9%
Population3,925318

Aberfeldie vs Noorat: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $435K in Noorat, which makes Noorat the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Noorat leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.79%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.81 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +16.4% in Noorat, so recent momentum favours Noorat, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 3.9% in Noorat, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 318, roughly 12 times the size of Noorat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Noorat for rental income, Noorat for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison