Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Ombersley

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Ombersley, VIC 3241

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Ombersley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieOmbersley
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$685K$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%1.60%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.53%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.5%
Population3,92593

Aberfeldie vs Ombersley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Aberfeldie and $1.8M in Ombersley, so Ombersley is the cheaper entry point, with Aberfeldie houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $365K in Ombersley, which makes Ombersley the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberfeldie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.98%, compared with 1.60% in Ombersley, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Ombersley and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Ombersley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 93, roughly 42 times the size of Ombersley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberfeldie for rental income, Ombersley for a lower purchase price, Ombersley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison