Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Pakenham Upper

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Pakenham Upper, VIC 3810

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 3, Pakenham Upper wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldiePakenham Upper
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%1.97%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.11%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%6.7%
Population3,9251,196

Aberfeldie vs Pakenham Upper: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $1.3M in Pakenham Upper, which makes Aberfeldie the more affordable unit market and Pakenham Upper the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 1.98% in Aberfeldie and 1.97% in Pakenham Upper, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 6.7% in Pakenham Upper, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 1,196, roughly 3.3 times the size of Pakenham Upper; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison