Aberfeldie vs Pheasant Creek
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Pheasant Creek, VIC 3757
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Pheasant Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Pheasant Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $650K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.68% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Population | 3,925 | 360 |
Aberfeldie vs Pheasant Creek: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $650K in Pheasant Creek, which makes Pheasant Creek the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Pheasant Creek and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Pheasant Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 360, roughly 11 times the size of Pheasant Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Pheasant Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Pheasant Creek, VIC 3757
Open Pheasant Creek suburb profileRecent sales in Pheasant Creek
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison