Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Rutherglen

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Rutherglen, VIC 3685

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Rutherglen wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieRutherglen
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K-
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%5.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.32%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+6.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.4%
Population3,9252,579

Aberfeldie vs Rutherglen: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Rutherglen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 3.02 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +6.2% in Rutherglen (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Rutherglen, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Rutherglen and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Rutherglen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 2,579, larger than Rutherglen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rutherglen for rental income, Rutherglen for recent price momentum, Rutherglen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison