Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Scarsdale

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Scarsdale, VIC 3351

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Scarsdale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieScarsdale
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$55K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+1.2%
3-year house growth-+4.3%
Vacancy rate1.5%10.0%
Population3,925855

Aberfeldie vs Scarsdale: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $55K in Scarsdale, which makes Scarsdale the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Scarsdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.02 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +1.2% in Scarsdale, so recent momentum favours Scarsdale, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 10.0% in Scarsdale, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 855, roughly 4.6 times the size of Scarsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Scarsdale for rental income, Scarsdale for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison