Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Sorrento

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Sorrento, VIC 3943

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 2, Sorrento wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieSorrento
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$685K-
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%2.17%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.08%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate-0.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%1.6%
Population3,9252,013

Aberfeldie vs Sorrento: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.8M in Aberfeldie and $1.8M in Sorrento.

On cash flow, Sorrento leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.17%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and -0.9% in Sorrento (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberfeldie, while Sorrento went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 1.6% in Sorrento, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 2,013, larger than Sorrento; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sorrento for rental income, Aberfeldie for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison