Aberfeldie vs Strathallan
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Strathallan, VIC 3622
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Strathallan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Strathallan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 3.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | -15.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | - |
| Population | 3,925 | 180 |
Aberfeldie vs Strathallan: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Strathallan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.66%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.68 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and -15.4% in Strathallan, so recent momentum favours Aberfeldie, while Strathallan went backwards.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 180, roughly 22 times the size of Strathallan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Strathallan for rental income, Aberfeldie for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison