Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Swan Reach

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Swan Reach, VIC 3903

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Swan Reach wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieSwan Reach
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$160K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%3.05%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+6.1%
3-year house growth--18.3%
Vacancy rate1.5%3.2%
Population3,925861

Aberfeldie vs Swan Reach: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $160K in Swan Reach, which makes Swan Reach the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Swan Reach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.05%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +6.1% in Swan Reach, so recent momentum favours Swan Reach, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 3.2% in Swan Reach, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 861, roughly 4.6 times the size of Swan Reach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Swan Reach for rental income, Swan Reach for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison