Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Tatura

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Tatura, VIC 3616

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Tatura wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieTatura
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%5.50%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.99%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+8.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%2.7%
Population3,9254,955

Aberfeldie vs Tatura: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $325K in Tatura, which makes Tatura the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tatura leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.50%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 3.52 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +8.7% in Tatura (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tatura, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 2.7% in Tatura, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tatura is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,955 against 3,925, larger than Aberfeldie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tatura for rental income, Tatura for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison