Aberfeldie vs Taylor Bay
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Taylor Bay, VIC 3713
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Taylor Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Taylor Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $655K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 3.19% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.05% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Population | 3,925 | 76 |
Aberfeldie vs Taylor Bay: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $655K in Taylor Bay, which makes Taylor Bay the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
On cash flow, Taylor Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.19%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.21 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.5%.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 76, roughly 52 times the size of Taylor Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Taylor Bay for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison