Aberfeldie vs Woorarra East
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Woorarra East, VIC 3962
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Woorarra East wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Woorarra East |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 2.02% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 0.9% |
| Population | 3,925 | 43 |
Aberfeldie vs Woorarra East: what the numbers say
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 1.98% in Aberfeldie and 2.02% in Woorarra East, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Woorarra East and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Woorarra East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 43, roughly 91 times the size of Woorarra East; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Woorarra East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison