Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Wurdiboluc

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Wurdiboluc, VIC 3241

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 3, Wurdiboluc wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieWurdiboluc
Median house price$1.8M$1.9M
Median unit price$685K$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%1.63%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.23%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.6%
Population3,925147

Aberfeldie vs Wurdiboluc: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Aberfeldie and $1.9M in Wurdiboluc, so Aberfeldie is the cheaper entry point, with Wurdiboluc houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $715K in Wurdiboluc, which makes Aberfeldie the more affordable unit market and Wurdiboluc the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberfeldie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.98%, compared with 1.63% in Wurdiboluc, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Wurdiboluc and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Wurdiboluc face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 147, roughly 27 times the size of Wurdiboluc; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberfeldie for rental income, Aberfeldie for a lower purchase price, Wurdiboluc for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison