Aberglasslyn vs Mount Irvine
Property investment comparison - Aberglasslyn, NSW 2320 vs Mount Irvine, NSW 2786
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberglasslyn wins 1, Mount Irvine wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberglasslyn | Mount Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | - |
| Median unit price | $705K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.90% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +9.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 8.3% |
| Population | 6,552 | 22 |
Aberglasslyn vs Mount Irvine: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Aberglasslyn and 8.3% in Mount Irvine, so landlords in Aberglasslyn face less competition for tenants.
Aberglasslyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,552 against 22, roughly 298 times the size of Mount Irvine; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberglasslyn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison