Skip to main content

Aberglasslyn vs Tarrawanna

Property investment comparison - Aberglasslyn, NSW 2320 vs Tarrawanna, NSW 2518

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberglasslyn wins 3, Tarrawanna wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberglasslynTarrawanna
Median house price$880K-
Median unit price$705K$830K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.48%
1-year house growth+9.9%estimate+0.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.6%
Population6,5522,184

Aberglasslyn vs Tarrawanna: what the numbers say

For units, Aberglasslyn sits at a median of $705K against $830K in Tarrawanna, which makes Aberglasslyn the more affordable unit market and Tarrawanna the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberglasslyn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.20% in Tarrawanna, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in Aberglasslyn (an estimate) and +0.3% in Tarrawanna (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberglasslyn, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Tarrawanna and 2.6% in Aberglasslyn, so landlords in Tarrawanna face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberglasslyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,552 against 2,184, roughly 3.0 times the size of Tarrawanna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberglasslyn for rental income, Aberglasslyn for recent price momentum, Tarrawanna for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison