Aberglasslyn vs Williamtown
Property investment comparison - Aberglasslyn, NSW 2320 vs Williamtown, NSW 2318
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberglasslyn wins 2, Williamtown wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberglasslyn | Williamtown |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | - |
| Median unit price | $705K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.90% | 3.71% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 8.52% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.9%estimate | +7.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +8.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.0% |
| Population | 6,552 | 762 |
Aberglasslyn vs Williamtown: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aberglasslyn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.71% in Williamtown, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in Aberglasslyn (an estimate) and +7.3% in Williamtown, so recent momentum favours Aberglasslyn, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Williamtown and 2.6% in Aberglasslyn, so landlords in Williamtown face less competition for tenants.
Aberglasslyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,552 against 762, roughly 9 times the size of Williamtown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberglasslyn for rental income, Aberglasslyn for recent price momentum, Williamtown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison