Skip to main content

Acacia Gardens vs Central Mangrove

Property investment comparison - Acacia Gardens, NSW 2763 vs Central Mangrove, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acacia Gardens wins 1, Central Mangrove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAcacia GardensCentral Mangrove
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price-$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.24%
Gross rental yield (units)3.77%5.69%
1-year house growth-3.0%-
3-year house growth+2.8%-
Vacancy rate1.2%0.8%
Population3,668253

Acacia Gardens vs Central Mangrove: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Acacia Gardens leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.24% in Central Mangrove, a gap of 0.86 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Central Mangrove and 1.2% in Acacia Gardens, so landlords in Central Mangrove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Acacia Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,668 against 253, roughly 14 times the size of Central Mangrove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Acacia Gardens for rental income, Central Mangrove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison