Skip to main content

Acacia Gardens vs Gwynneville

Property investment comparison - Acacia Gardens, NSW 2763 vs Gwynneville, NSW 2500

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acacia Gardens wins 1, Gwynneville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAcacia GardensGwynneville
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.09%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.25%4.50%
1-year house growth+2.3%estimate-1.5%
3-year house growth-+14.5%
Vacancy rate1.2%0.8%
Population3,6683,139

Acacia Gardens vs Gwynneville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Acacia Gardens and $1.3M in Gwynneville.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.3% in Acacia Gardens (an estimate) and -1.5% in Gwynneville, so recent momentum favours Acacia Gardens, while Gwynneville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gwynneville and 1.2% in Acacia Gardens, so landlords in Gwynneville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Acacia Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,668 against 3,139, larger than Gwynneville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Acacia Gardens for recent price momentum, Gwynneville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison