Skip to main content

Acacia Hills vs Mountain River

Property investment comparison - Acacia Hills, TAS 7306 vs Mountain River, TAS 7109

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acacia Hills wins 3, Mountain River wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAcacia HillsMountain River
Median house price$800K-
Median unit price$420K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.96%2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)4.48%6.08%
1-year house growth+7.6%-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%12.7%
Population729606

Acacia Hills vs Mountain River: what the numbers say

For units, Acacia Hills sits at a median of $420K against $445K in Mountain River, which makes Acacia Hills the more affordable unit market and Mountain River the pricier one.

On cash flow, Acacia Hills leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.96%, compared with 2.23% in Mountain River, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Acacia Hills and 12.7% in Mountain River, so landlords in Acacia Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Acacia Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 729 against 606, larger than Mountain River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Acacia Hills for rental income, Acacia Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison