Skip to main content

Adamstown Heights vs Stockton

Property investment comparison - Adamstown Heights, NSW 2289 vs Stockton, NSW 2295

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adamstown Heights wins 4, Stockton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdamstown HeightsStockton
Median house price$1.3M$1.4M
Median unit price$840K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.03%2.96%
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%2.44%
1-year house growth+14.1%estimate+8.0%
3-year house growth-+15.8%
Vacancy rate3.2%0.9%
Population5,6214,046

Adamstown Heights vs Stockton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Adamstown Heights and $1.4M in Stockton, so Adamstown Heights is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Adamstown Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.03%, compared with 2.96% in Stockton, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Adamstown Heights (an estimate) and +8.0% in Stockton, so recent momentum favours Adamstown Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Stockton and 3.2% in Adamstown Heights, so landlords in Stockton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Adamstown Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,621 against 4,046, larger than Stockton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adamstown Heights for rental income, Adamstown Heights for a lower purchase price, Adamstown Heights for recent price momentum, Stockton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison