Skip to main content

Adamstown vs Mount Annan

Property investment comparison - Adamstown, NSW 2289 vs Mount Annan, NSW 2567

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adamstown wins 5, Mount Annan wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdamstownMount Annan
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.35%4.10%
1-year house growth+11.7%+8.4%
3-year house growth+26.2%+18.2%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.6%
Population6,33511,784

Adamstown vs Mount Annan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Adamstown and $1.2M in Mount Annan, so Adamstown is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Adamstown and +8.4% in Mount Annan, so recent momentum favours Adamstown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Adamstown houses are +26.2% and Mount Annan houses +18.2%, so Adamstown has compounded faster than Mount Annan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Adamstown and 1.6% in Mount Annan, so landlords in Adamstown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mount Annan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,784 against 6,335, larger than Adamstown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adamstown for a lower purchase price, Adamstown for recent price momentum, Adamstown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison